Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Honor 9X Pro, having an 81.3 score against 71.9. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's body is thinner and way lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a higher pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Honor 9X Pro features a better storage for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Honor 9X Pro counts with superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Honor 9X Pro captures much better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.