Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Honor 9X Pro's score of 71.9. LG Velvet's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor 9X Pro, although both were released with only 1 months difference. LG Velvet counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG Velvet features a slightly better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a quite higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a bit larger display. The LG Velvet captures slightly better photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, a F1.8 aperture and a 0.5 inches sensor, the LG Velvet also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. LG Velvet features just a little better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.