Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot better than Honor 9X Pro, with a score of 87.1 against 71.9. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer device, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Honor 9X Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little better display density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Honor 9X Pro features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a better 50 MP resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and a larger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.