Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the Honor 9X Pro's global score of 71.9. Both devices in this comparison include Android operating system, but Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features. Even though the Moto Z3 is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's body is notably thinner and much lighter.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Honor 9X Pro features a better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution.
Honor 9X Pro counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.