Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro, with a score of 87 against 71.9. The Motorola razr (2020) body is thinner and a bit lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, even though both were released only 6 months apart. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and enhanced performance.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a little greater pixel count per inch of display, a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better camera than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a way better video resolution.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Honor 9X Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Honor 9X Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.