Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is better than the Honor 9X Pro's overall score of 71.9. Even though the Nokia XR20 is newer than Honor 9X Pro, it's thicker and notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has a newer 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, giving you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Honor 9X Pro has a bit superior CPU than Nokia XR20. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Nokia XR20 has a little sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bigger display and a little greater screen density. Honor 9X Pro has a bit better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same camera aperture, a 48 mega pixels back-facing camera and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 9X Pro also has a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Honor 9X Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.