Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A31 and Honor 9X Pro were released only 0 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A31 is just a little thinner and lighter. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The Honor 9X Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A31 features a little more vivid screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit higher display density.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy A31 counts with superior battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Honor 9X Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a same size back camera sensor and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also has better video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.