Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Honor 9X Pro, having an 83.8 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than Honor 9X Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy A50 has a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A50 and Honor 9X Pro both count with really similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A50 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Honor 9X Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Honor 9X Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 both feature similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.