Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Honor 9X Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 71.9. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than Honor 9X Pro, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixel count in each display inch. The Honor 9X Pro features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A51 5G's CPU is very similar to Honor 9X Pro's CPU, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a little better battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.