Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer, a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Honor 9X Pro.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Honor 9X Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G feature really similar processing units, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher (4K) video quality, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.