Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Honor 9X Pro's overall score of 71.9. Galaxy A6's design is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Honor 9X Pro, even though it was released about 23 months before. The Honor 9X Pro has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher pixels density, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has more RAM memory. Honor 9X Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
Honor 9X Pro features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor 9X Pro features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.