Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Honor 9X Pro's general score of 71.9. Although Galaxy A7 (2017) is extremely older than Honor 9X Pro, it's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter. Honor 9X Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Honor 9X Pro has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit better pixel density, a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Honor 9X Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Honor 9X Pro has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory. The Honor 9X Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.