Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than Honor 9X Pro's score of 71.9. Both phones in this review include the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should give all the same operating system features. Even though the Galaxy A70 is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy A70 and Honor 9X Pro feature quite similar displays, although the Galaxy A70 also has a quite larger screen, a little better screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Honor 9X Pro counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A70. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Honor 9X Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A70 features a bit longer battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.