Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro's general score of 71.9. Even when the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Honor 9X Pro were released with only 3 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better processing power than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger display and a little greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better pictures and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos.
Honor 9X Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.