Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is way better than the Honor 9X Pro, getting a score of 88.1 against 71.9. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than the Honor 9X Pro, it is just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features.
Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bigger display. Honor 9X Pro features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62's CPU is very similar to the Honor 9X Pro one, and although the Galaxy F62 has less cpu cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy F62 features a slightly better camera than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.