Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Honor 9X Pro, with a global score of 97.6 against 71.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Honor 9X Pro were released with only 7 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is much heavier but notably thinner than the Honor 9X Pro. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little better processing power than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Honor 9X Pro and Galaxy Fold both feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Fold has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a little bit bigger display.
Honor 9X Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.