Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than Honor 9X Pro, having a 78.9 score against 71.9. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should count with the same operating system features. The Galaxy M20 is a a little lighter cellphone than the Honor 9X Pro, but both are 0.35inches thick.
The Honor 9X Pro and the Galaxy M20 feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy M20 has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. Honor 9X Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has more internal memory.
The Honor 9X Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M20 has longer battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 25% more battery size. Honor 9X Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.