Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than Honor 9X Pro's global score of 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is just a little heavier but a little bit thinner than Honor 9X Pro, and they were released only a couple of months apart. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a bit larger display.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a way better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.