Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is better than Honor 9X Pro, with a global score of 80.4 against 71.9. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an incredibly older cellphone than Honor 9X Pro, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a processing unit that is very similar to the Honor 9X Pro one, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Honor 9X Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and faster video frame rate.
The Honor 9X Pro features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Honor 9X Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.