Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is way better than Honor 9X Pro, with an 88.3 score against 71.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 is older than Honor 9X Pro, it's design is thinner and notably lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better CPU than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 features a sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Honor 9X Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The Honor 9X Pro has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage. The Honor 9X Pro features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.