Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Honor 9X Pro, getting a general score of 93.6 against 71.9. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features and a performance increase. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's construction is a bit lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen. The Honor 9X Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Honor 9X Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Honor 9X Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.