Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro, having a score of 86.3 against 71.9. The Galaxy S10e construction is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processing unit than Honor 9X Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Honor 9X Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has more internal storage capacity.
The Honor 9X Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Honor 9X Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.