Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is way better than the Honor 9X Pro's score of 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor 9X Pro, even though they were only released 1 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S20 has just a little better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a more vivid screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Honor 9X Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and higher video frame rate.
Honor 9X Pro has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20's battery duration is very similar to the battery duration in Honor 9X Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.