Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Honor 9X Pro, having a 98 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a little bit heavier phone than the Honor 9X Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger screen.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features improved battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.