Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-17 | -- |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Honor 9X Pro, having a 90.7 score against 71.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is thinner and notably lighter than Honor 9X Pro. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version.
Honor 9X Pro has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit larger display and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a lot larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Honor 9X Pro features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the Honor 9X Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.