Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is better than Honor 9X Pro, with a 79.5 score against 71.9. Galaxy S7's design is a lot lighter and thinner than the Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Honor 9X Pro features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of 2.2 gigahertz cores and more RAM memory. Honor 9X Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 9X Pro counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.