Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 general score. The Galaxy S7 Active construction is lighter than Honor 9X Pro, although it's thicker and was released 4 years before. The Honor 9X Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Honor 9X Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and higher video frame rate.
The Honor 9X Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Honor 9X Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.