Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Honor 9X Pro, with a score of 78.1 against 71.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, counting with some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the Honor 9X Pro, although it was released 4 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a bit more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 224 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more 2.2 gigahertz cores and more RAM memory. The Honor 9X Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs, better video frame rate and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Honor 9X Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.