Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 global score. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Honor 9X Pro. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, counting with some additional features.
Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is very similar to the processing unit in Honor 9X Pro, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each display inch.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little longer battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Honor 9X Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.