Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro's general score of 71.9. Even when Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Honor 9X Pro were only released 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and lighter. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a quite larger display and a just a little higher pixels density.
Honor 9X Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Honor 9X Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor 9X Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.