Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Honor 9X Pro, even though both were only released 4 months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little higher screen density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Honor 9X Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Honor 9X Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor 9X Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Honor 9X Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also has a lot higher resolution back camera and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.