Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than the Honor 9X Pro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 71.9. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is an a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the Honor 9X Pro. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should provide the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit faster CPU than Honor 9X Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger screen.
The Honor 9X Pro has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has longer battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better camera than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.