Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, having a global score of 87.1 against 76.6. The Galaxy Note9 design has the same thickness than Honor Magic 6 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit better display than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a camera with a much better 50 MP resolution, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.