Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 72.8. The Apple iPhone X construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X has a little more vivid screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The iPhone X's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Honor Magic3 Pro one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X features a camera that's just as good as the Honor Magic3 Pro one, because although the iPhone X has a back-facing camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 69% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.