Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a global score of 82 against 72.8. Even though the Apple iPhone XR is extremely older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a little bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1344 x 2772 pixels and a higher pixels amount per inch of screen.
The iPhone XR has a little better hardware performance than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a camera that is very similar to the Honor Magic3 Pro one, because although the Apple iPhone XR has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting way lower quality videos and pictures and a lot lower resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.