Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is better than Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 score. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is noticeably older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's design is thinner and lighter. IPhone XS has a bit better looking display than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a little faster processing unit than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 2 less and slower processing cores and 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 73% more battery capacity. IPhone XS counts with a camera that is just as good as Honor Magic3 Pro's camera, because although the iPhone XS has a camera with much less MP resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a much lower photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.