Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than Honor Magic3 Pro's overall score of 72.8. Google Pixel 3a's body is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a higher 1344 x 2772 resolution and a larger display.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Honor Magic3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.