Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 453 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than Honor Magic3 Pro's overall score of 72.8. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11. HTC One M9 is a way older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but HTC was able to make it notably lighter anyway.
HTC One M9 counts with a little sharper screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a little lower pixels amount per inch of screen, a lot smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processor. HTC One M9's camera is just as good as Honor Magic3 Pro's camera, although the HTC One M9 has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video and a way smaller sensor capturing much lower quality videos and pictures.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.