Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 overall score. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a just a bit higher display density.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Honor Magic3 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Honor Magic3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.