Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Honor Magic3 Pro, with a score of 83.8 against 72.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Honor Magic3 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772 and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A50 features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor Magic3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 both have quite similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a much less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.