Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting an 86.6 score against 72.8. Even though the Galaxy A50s is older than the Honor Magic3 Pro, it's body is thinner and notably lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version.
Honor Magic3 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite greater pixels number in each inch of screen, a little larger screen and a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772 pixels.
Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light captures, a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much tinier camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.