Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Honor Magic3 Pro, with an 85.5 score against 72.8. Even though Galaxy A51 is older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A51, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772px and a little higher screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels resolution, a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a way lower image quality and a smaller camera aperture. Galaxy A51 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.