Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 72.8. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. The Galaxy A51 5G design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the Honor Magic3 Pro, even though it was released just 16 months before. The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a higher 1344 x 2772 pixels resolution.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots better photos and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a lot smaller sensor shooting way worse quality videos and images, a back facing camera with a lower resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Honor Magic3 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.