Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's global score of 72.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner device than Honor Magic3 Pro, even when both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1344 x 2772px. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a greater memory to store more apps and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Honor Magic3 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.