Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is lighter and just a little thinner than Honor Magic3 Pro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772px and a just a little better display pixels density. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s takes better photos and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.