Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Honor Magic3 Pro's 72.8 score. Although Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is notably older than the Honor Magic3 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a higher resolution of 1344 x 2772 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a bit better screen pixel density.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Honor Magic3 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same aperture, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Honor Magic3 Pro features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.