Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro's overall score of 72.8. Galaxy Note 20's body is just a little thinner and a little lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, even though it was released about 12 months before. The Honor Magic3 Pro and the Galaxy Note 20 count with quite similar processing units, both have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a little better pixels count in each inch in the display, a better 1344 x 2772 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.