Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro's score of 72.8. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Honor Magic3 Pro, although it was released around 12 months before.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Honor Magic3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video and a way better resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.