Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Honor Magic3 Pro, having a 79.3 score against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
Honor Magic3 Pro features a better performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more cores. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 53 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.