Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting a global score of 89 against 72.8. The Galaxy Note10 design is somewhat thinner and way lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite larger display, a higher 1344 x 2772px resolution and a just a little better pixel amount per inch in the screen.
The Honor Magic3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 feature very similar storage to store more apps and games, both have the same 256 GB internal storage. The Honor Magic3 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note10. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera and a lot smaller back camera sensor offering a way worse image quality, it also counts with a lot larger aperture.
Honor Magic3 Pro features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 31 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.